The Nature of Justice Since friendship is an important feature of the good life and virtuous habits can be acquired through moral education and legislation, Aristotle regarded life within a moral community as a vital component of human morality. Even in the Ethics, he had noted that social order is presumed by the general concept of justice. Ethics V 2 Properly considered, justice is concerned with the equitability or fairness in interpersonal relations. Thus, Aristotle offered an account of distributive justice that made allowances for the social rectification of individual wrongs.
Here it is in its entirety: The most widely regarded view is that Shakespeare used the model of tragedy set up by Aristotle.
There are some problems with this, however. Aristolean Tragedy The model of an Aristotelian tragedy begins with the protagonist tragic hero. The protagonist must begin as someone of importance or fortune.
The usual example is someone of royalty. He cannot be perfect, though. The audience must be able to relate to the hero, so Aristotle said the hero must have tragic flaws that balance his otherwise good character.
Aristotle usually made this flaw hubris an all-consuming pride that causes the individual to ignore a moral tenant or a divine warning.
These flaws culminate in the humiliation, defeat, and death of the protagonist. This should invite the audience to feel a great pity for the character because he can be related to, and the audience can put themselves in his position. The play must end in a catharsis.
The catharsis is the event of the audience losing their feelings of anxiety and feer and finally reaching a sense of completion.
The Aristotelian model also follows the classical unities of time and place. The five plays I talk about on this site need to be divided into two groups. These are the four great tragedies and best follow the Aristotelian model.
They all have a protagonist that has a tragic flaw that eventually leads to his downfall. Aristotle had a tendency to exaggerate the flaw, while Shakespeare makes it more real.
This is just about the only thing it has in common with the Aristotelian tragedy though. Shakespeare loved to make a complicated plot with many sub-plots in order to make the play that much more real and meaningful to the audience.
Therefore, he did not limit his tragedies to the classical unities. The catharsis is another difference. Instead, the plays end with the audience remaining in awe at the absolute destruction of the protagonist.
There is just the feeling of amazement at the utter despair of the play. It does not even attempt to follow the Aristotelain tragedy. Their love could be interpreted as tragic flaws, but such a thought is a long stretch.
Their love is attacked by external forces, however. The tragedy in this play is not tragic flaws within the protagonists but the fact that circumstances are tearing their great love to sunders.Eventually the Aristotelian tragic hero dies a tragic death, having fallen from great heights and having made an irreversible mistake.
The hero must courageously accept their death with honour. To define a tragic hero, it is probably best to use Aristotle's characteristics of a tragic hero. It is slightly frustrating that different sources will have slightly different characteristics for.
The tragic hero is a longstanding literary concept, a character with a Fatal Flaw (like Pride, for example) who is doomed to fail in search of their Tragic .
A tragic hero is the protagonist of a tragedy in rutadeltambor.com his Poetics, Aristotle records the descriptions of the tragic hero to the playwright and strictly defines the place that the tragic hero must play and the kind of man he must be.
Aristotle based his observations on previous dramas.
Many of the most famous instances of tragic heroes appear in Greek literature, most notably the works of. An Analysis of Hamlet under Aristotle’s Theory on Tragedy Aristotle, as a world famous philosopher, gives a clear definition of tragedy in his influential masterpiece Poetics, a well-known Greek technical handbook of literary criticism.
That treatise is Aristotle's Politics, a comprehensive examination of the origins and structure of the rutadeltambor.com Plato, Aristotle supposed that the need for a division of labor is the initial occasion of the formation of a society, whose structure will be modelled upon that of the rutadeltambor.comcs.