Christianity and the ethics of war The main Christian view of war ethics is contained in the doctrine of the Just War.
He is incorrect in an underlying assumption: Violence is not a legitimate means of participating in conflict. Augustine and a myriad of others took up the issue with varying points of view and results. On the other hand they can, when asked to walk one mile, walk two instead.
George W Bush and Dick Cheney were so far from acceptable Christian thinking not to mention human thinking on Iraq2 that it is both incredible as well as unforgivable. Hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians have been killed in our name for doing something they had nothing to do with.
Who would blame them for not forgiving u. The Japanese have forgiven u. Iraq2 was clouded by circumstances of kindergarden behavior. Then you made up a new theory that DID give you the answer you wanted. This is one of the best examples of the process of intellectual dishonesty I have ever seen.
My understanding is that the sanctions you wanted to tighten were killing 50, Iraqi children per year. The war killedIraqis.
On that one tiny teensy bit of data, your elaborate exercise in intellectual dishonesty fails. The war was worth the cost. The world is a better place.
Only dishonest leftist pseudo-intellectuals dare argue otherwise. The way President Obama does. You would do well to follow his lead. I have no problem with that. As a historical fact and theological reality the criteria for judging a war is whether you win or lose.
Since our conscience and superstition creates a US vs. What kind of insane diatribe are you spewing?? WmarkW Any war is just if: Clarke found it incredulous that no matter what he said about Al Qaeda, and Afghanistan being the biggest threat, the Bush administration ignored him and continued on with their Iraq plans, based on lies, twisted inaccurate intelligence, and hearing what they wanted to hear.
It was an invasion, and now over service people are dead because the US invaded another country that was no threat. All wars are the result of, if I may, the pursuit of wealth and power. A study of events leading to a war will always show a war became inevitable.
WWII was the result of a desire by the major countries of FranceGreat Britain, and the USA to appease and manipulate the Fascist Axis to go to war against the Soviet Union thereby removing the existence of an economic alternative to capitalism.
Both Germany and Italy could have been easily prevented from becoming military powers. The Vietnam and Iraq wars of choice did not and Iran, North Korea, and Pakistan potential wars of choice never will be just.
Making the choice to kill, maim, and destroy is, quite frankly, evil. For example, if Bill Clinton had sent US troops to Rwanda to kill, maim and destroy the genocidal gangs slaughtering their neighbors, that would have been a good thing. By withholding our soldiers, we intentionally increased the killing, maiming and destroying.
You are a moral coward. Then you go on to say the world is a more better place. Who are you and why is your opinion right an the one who contradicts your opinion wrong.
Your opinion is in the minority — not only in the U. And why is it that everyone who disagrees with a warmonger automatically categorized as a dishonest lefty. You have to just resort to making subjective statements and then name calling anyone who disagrees with your subjective statement which in essence says: You are just spewing nonsense.
Haass condemns Just War theory for being too subjective and then recommends for his justifiable wars a purely subjective test:Outline the key concepts of Just War and Pacifism.
A01  The Just war theory maintains that war may be justified if fought only in certain circumstances, and only if certain restrictions are applied to the way in which war is fought. There are no “just wars”, though sometimes one side or the other, almost invariably the country or people who are attacked, may be “justified” in rutadeltambor.com as far as “justifiable war” goes, in a world full of professional spin doctors any conflict can be made to look “justifiable” to one side or the other, or both, at least.
If the war meets these six criteria, it can be considered morally justified.
Let's leave aside the question of whether such a judgment should be considered Christian. Outline the key concepts of Just War and Pacifism. A01  The Just war theory maintains that war may be justified if fought only in certain circumstances, and only if certain restrictions are applied to the way in which war is fought.
Political violence is the resort to violence for political ends. War, terrorism, torture, revolution, assassination, civil war, and violent demonstrations are examples. Violence is the physical or psychological attack on, or the vigorous abuse of, persons, causing their suffering, injury, or death.
Jul 20, · The just war theory is a largely Christian philosophy that attempts to reconcile three things: taking human life is seriously wrong. states have a duty to defend their citizens, and defend justice.
protecting innocent human life and defending important moral values sometimes requires willingness to use force and violence.